Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete columns with five-spiral reinforcement
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F22%3A00359755" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/22:00359755 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105245" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105245</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105245" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105245</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete columns with five-spiral reinforcement
Original language description
Multi-spiral transverse reinforcement has been shown to provide superior seismic performance than conventional rectilinear tie reinforcement. This research intends to investigate the flexural behavior of the five-spiral transverse reinforcement configuration for square concrete columns. Large-scale flexure-critical five-spiral columns and counterpart conventional tied columns were tested under low and high constant axial load and subjected to double-curvature lateral cyclic loading. Test results showed that with 16%–29% less transverse reinforcement, the five-spiral columns displayed superior flexural strength, higher ductility, and larger drift capacities than the counterpart conventional tied columns. The five-spiral columns also showed improvements in the seismic capacity of the column in terms of energy dissipation. Furthermore, it was determined that the nominal moment strength could conservatively compute the actual moment strength of five-spiral columns. However, the five-spiral columns showed a higher flexural overstrength from the nominal moment than the counterpart tied columns. From the existing code methods examined in calculating the expected maximum moment, the Caltrans SDC 2019 method provided the best prediction of the maximum flexural strength of the columns, followed by the AASHTO 2017 method, then the ACI318-19 method. All three methods, however, could not fully capture the superior confinement effect of the five-spiral reinforcement.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20101 - Civil engineering
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Building Engineering
ISSN
2352-7102
e-ISSN
2352-7102
Volume of the periodical
61
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000861604700002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85138826579