UAV DTM acquisition in a forested area - comparison of low-cost photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) and LiDAR solutions (DJI Zenmuse L1)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F23%3A00365191" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/23:00365191 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942" target="_blank" >10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
UAV DTM acquisition in a forested area - comparison of low-cost photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) and LiDAR solutions (DJI Zenmuse L1)
Original language description
In this paper, we evaluated the results in terms of accuracy and coverage of the LiDAR-UAV system DJI Zenmuse L1 and Digital Aerial Photogrammetric system (DAP - UAV) DJI Zenmuse P1 in a forested area under leaf-off conditions on three sites with varying terrain ruggedness/tree type combinations. Detailed reference clouds were obtained using terrestrial scanning by Leica P40. Our results show that branches pose no problem to the accuracy of LiDAR-UAV and DAP-UAV derived terrain clouds. Elevation accuracies for photogrammetric data were even better than for LiDAR data - as low as 0.015 m on all sites. However, the LiDAR system provided better coverage, with almost full coverage at all sites, while the DAP-UAV coverage declined with the increasing density of branches (being worst in the young forest). In the very dense young forest (Site 1), the coverage by photogrammetrically extracted terrain cloud using high calculation quality and no filtering achieved 80.7% coverage, while LiDAR-UAV reached almost 100% coverage. The importance of the use of multiple (or last) returns when using LiDAR-UAV systems was demonstrated by the fact that on the site with the densest vegetation, only 11% of the ground points were represented by first returns.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20101 - Civil engineering
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/CK03000168" target="_blank" >CK03000168: Intelligent methods of digital data acquisition and analysis for bridge inspections</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European Journal of Remote Sensing
ISSN
2279-7254
e-ISSN
2279-7254
Volume of the periodical
56
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
1-20
UT code for WoS article
000941059900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85149361899