Types of Mobile Mapping Approaches Compared to Static Terrestrial Scanning
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00383581" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00383581 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://fin.uni-pr.edu/page.aspx?id=1,167" target="_blank" >https://fin.uni-pr.edu/page.aspx?id=1,167</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Types of Mobile Mapping Approaches Compared to Static Terrestrial Scanning
Original language description
This article evaluates and compares two modern spatial data acquisition technologies, mobile mapping, and static terrestrial scanning, in terms of data collection and processing effort, accuracy, and integrity of the resulting point clouds. Mobile mapping contains a group of tools that use moving media such as vehicles or pedestrian surveys to collect data. Three types of mobile mapping devices were tested: spherical imaging followed by reconstruction using SfM (Structure from Motion) to create point clouds; the Faro Orbis mobile laser scanner that rapidly collects data indoors and outdoors using a combination of laser scanning, an inertial unit (INS), and SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping); and the VMX-2HA vehicle-mounted mobile mapping system using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), INS, and SLAM for mass data collection in exterior. A Trimble X7 scanning system was used for static scanning, and the resulting reference point clouds were created by combining several survey stations. The results show the differences between the types of mobile mapping methods and their advantages, also compared to static scanning. SfM from spherical imagery is suitable for creating models with lower accuracy and density requirements for point clouds, while Faro Orbis and VMX-2HA provide the flexibility to collect data with varying levels of accuracy and detail in interiors and exteriors. The choice between these methods depends on the specific requirements of the project. This paper provides an overview and comparison of key parameters to facilitate the selection of the appropriate technology for a given application.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20101 - Civil engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Book of Proceedings : Second International Student Conference of Civil Engineering (ISCCE 2024)
ISBN
978-9951-00-370-4
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
586-593
Publisher name
University of Pristina
Place of publication
Pristina
Event location
Civil Engineering Faculty, Prishtina
Event date
Apr 25, 2024
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—