Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F11%3A00184210" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/11:00184210 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60218-6" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60218-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60218-6" target="_blank" >10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60218-6</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration
Original language description
This paper compares three methods for natural gas dehydration that are widely applied in industry: (1) absorption by triethylene glycol, (2) adsorption on solid desiccants and (3) condensation. A comparison is made according to their energy demand and suitability for use. The energy calculations are performed on a model where 105 Nm3/h water saturated natural gas is processed at 30 °C. The pressure of the gas varies from 7 to 20 MPa. The required outlet concentration of water in natural gas is equivalent to the dew point temperature of -10 °C at gas pressure of 4MPa.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
CI - Industrial chemistry and chemical engineering
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/FR-TI1%2F173" target="_blank" >FR-TI1/173: Innovation and Optimization of the Technologies for Natural Gas Drying to Increase the Capacity of Existing and Construction of new Natural Gas Storages.</a><br>
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)