All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Techno-economic evaluation of CO2 transport from a lignite-fired IGCC plant in the Czech Republic

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F17%3A00320321" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/17:00320321 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583617300373" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583617300373</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.022" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.022</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Techno-economic evaluation of CO2 transport from a lignite-fired IGCC plant in the Czech Republic

  • Original language description

    This paper investigates different strategies for CO2 conditioning and transport options for the CO2 to be captured at a lignite-fired IGCC in the Czech Republic, including the impact of impurities present in the captured CO2 streams. Four transport cases, combining two transport delivery location scenarios (Czech storage and European transport hub) and two transport technology options (pipeline-based and train-based transport), are designed and evaluated. For the Czech storage case, the cost evaluation of the CO2 conditioning and transport results in costs of 10.5 and 18.3 (sic)/tCO(2) for the pipeline and train options respectively. In the European hub scenario, the CO2 conditioning and transport costs are estimated at 15.4 and 24.9 (sic)/tCO(2). These results clearly identify the pipeline transport options as the cost-optimal solutions for CO2 transport in both delivery location scenarios, due to the longer transport distances and higher conditioning costs involved for train-based export. Moreover, the comparison of transport delivery location scenarios also shows that if CO2 storage is not possible at the Czech storage location and the CO2 has to pass through the European hub, this would result in an increase of at least 4.9 (sic)/tCO(2), plus the additional transport and storage costs after the European hub stage. In addition, further assessments are performed to evaluate the impact of impurities in the CO2 streams from the capture plant on the CO2 conditioning and transport costs for the four combinations of transport scenarios and technology options. The results show that the impurities present in the CO2 streams lead to increases in CO2 conditioning and transport costs ranging from 1.6 to 11.4% (0.2-1.9 (sic)/tCO(2)). However, the energy and cost impacts associated with the impurities are highly dependent on the transport technology and transport delivery location scenario considered. Furthermore, the process energy and cost performances of two alternative CO

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20704 - Energy and fuels

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL

  • ISSN

    1750-5836

  • e-ISSN

    1878-0148

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Říjen

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    235-250

  • UT code for WoS article

    000412457800021

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85032934212