ADVANCED S-CO2 BRAYTON POWER CYCLES IN NUCLEAR AND FUSION ENERGY
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F19%3A00337847" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/19:00337847 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61389021:_____/19:00531032
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2019-90777" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2019-90777</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/GT2019-90777" target="_blank" >10.1115/GT2019-90777</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
ADVANCED S-CO2 BRAYTON POWER CYCLES IN NUCLEAR AND FUSION ENERGY
Original language description
Cooling system is one of the most important part of the power plants and cooling systems based on S-CO2 (Supercritical Carbon Dioxide) coolant seems nowadays perspective alternative to Helium and Rankine steam power cycles. Due to many advantages of S-CO2, these cooling systems are researched on many institutions and the results confirm that it should be successful for the future cooling systems design. One of the main objectives is comparison of the possible cooling mediums of DEMO2 (Demonstration power plant 2) with focusing on different power cycles with S-CO2. The First part of this article targets on comparison of three main coolants: steam, helium and S-CO2. The second part of this article focuses on the new software called CCOCS (Cooling Cycles Optimization Computational Software) which was developed on CTU in Prague. This software works on deeper optimization of the power cycles with various coolants and initial conditions. The third part describes advanced S-CO2 power cycles and enlarges past research, which was based on optimization of S-CO2 Brayton Simple power cycle and S-CO2 Re-compression power cycle both with recuperation and their usage in fusion and Fission energy engineering. It is possible to heighten thermodynamic efficiency of power cycle by changing the layout of the power cycle and the main objective of this paper is to compare four advanced layouts, describe the results of the optimization of these cycles and outline advantages and disadvantages of chosen optimized layouts.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20303 - Thermodynamics
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000778" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000778: Center for advanced applied science</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION
ISBN
978-0-7918-5872-1
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
—
Publisher name
American Society of Mechanical Engineers - ASME
Place of publication
New York
Event location
Phoenix, Arizona
Event date
Jun 17, 2019
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
000502169000042