All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Roster evaluation based on classifiers for the nurse rostering problem

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F16%3A00302613" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/16:00302613 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10732-016-9314-9" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10732-016-9314-9</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10732-016-9314-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10732-016-9314-9</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Roster evaluation based on classifiers for the nurse rostering problem

  • Original language description

    The personnel scheduling problem is a well-known NP-hard combinatorial problem. Due to the complexity of this problem and the size of the real-world instances, it is not possible to use exact methods, and thus heuristics, meta-heuristics, or hyper-heuristics must be employed. The majority of heuristic approaches are based on iterative search, where the quality of intermediate solutions must be calculated. Unfortunately, this is computationally highly expensive because these problems have many constraints and some are very complex. In this study, we propose a machine learning technique as a tool to accelerate the evaluation phase in heuristic approaches. The solution is based on a simple classifier, which is able to determine whether the changed solution (more precisely, the changed part of the solution) is better than the original or not. This decision is made much faster than a standard cost-oriented evaluation process. However, the classification process cannot guarantee 100 % correctness. Therefore, our approach, which is illustrated using a tabu search algorithm in this study, includes a filtering mechanism, where the classifier rejects the majority of the potentially bad solutions and the remaining solutions are then evaluated in a standard manner. We also show how the boosting algorithms can improve the quality of the final solution compared with a simple classifier. We verified our proposed approach and premises, based on standard and real-world benchmark instances, to demonstrate the significant speedup obtained with comparable solution quality.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    JC - Computer hardware and software

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Heuristics

  • ISSN

    1381-1231

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    22

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    31

  • Pages from-to

    667-697

  • UT code for WoS article

    000386163700002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84986243920