All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Anomaly Detectors: Context Matters

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F22%3A00352126" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/22:00352126 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21340/22:00352126

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3116269" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3116269</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3116269" target="_blank" >10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3116269</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Anomaly Detectors: Context Matters

  • Original language description

    Deep generative models are challenging the classical methods in the field of anomaly detection nowadays. Every newly published method provides evidence of outperforming its predecessors, sometimes with contradictory results. The objective of this article is twofold: to compare anomaly detection methods of various paradigms with a focus on deep generative models and identification of sources of variability that can yield different results. The methods were compared on popular tabular and image datasets. We identified that the main sources of variability are the experimental conditions: 1) the type of dataset (tabular or image) and the nature of anomalies (statistical or semantic) and 2) strategy of selection of hyperparameters, especially the number of available anomalies in the validation set. Methods perform differently in different contexts, i.e., under a different combination of experimental conditions together with computational time. This explains the variability of the previous results and highlights the importance of careful specification of the context in the publication of a new method. All our code and results are available for download.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

  • ISSN

    2162-237X

  • e-ISSN

    2162-2388

  • Volume of the periodical

    33

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    2494-2507

  • UT code for WoS article

    000732313900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85117345443