All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Overview of Test Coverage Criteria for Test Case Generation from Finite State Machines Modelled as Directed Graphs

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F22%3A00362687" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/22:00362687 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00044" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00044</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00044" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00044</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Overview of Test Coverage Criteria for Test Case Generation from Finite State Machines Modelled as Directed Graphs

  • Original language description

    Test Coverage criteria are an essential concept for test engineers when generating the test cases from a System Under Test model. They are routinely used in test case generation for user interfaces, middleware, and back-end system parts for software, electronics, or Internet of Things (IoT) systems. Test Coverage criteria define the number of actions or combinations by which a system is tested, informally determining a potential "strength" of a test set. As no previous study summarized all commonly used test coverage criteria for Finite State Machines and comprehensively discussed them regarding their subsumption, equivalence, or non-comparability, this paper provides this overview. In this study, 14 most common test coverage criteria and seven of their synonyms for Finite State Machines defined via a directed graph are summarized and compared. The results give researchers and industry testing engineers a helpful overview when setting a software-based or IoT system test strategy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000765" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000765: Research Center for Informatics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of 2022 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshop

  • ISBN

    978-1-6654-9628-5

  • ISSN

    2159-4848

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    207-214

  • Publisher name

    IEEE Computer Society

  • Place of publication

    Cannes

  • Event location

    Virtual Event

  • Event date

    Apr 4, 2022

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000861805200031