All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Input/output Functions of Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Measured Using Nonlinear Extraction Method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F24%3A00379574" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/24:00379574 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68407700:21340/24:00379574

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13619315" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13619315</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13619315" target="_blank" >10.5281/zenodo.13619315</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Input/output Functions of Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Measured Using Nonlinear Extraction Method

  • Original language description

    Otoacoustic emissions are generated by two fundamental mechanisms: nonlinear distortion and linear reflection. Abdala and Kalluri suggested combining information from two different types of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), each generated by a different mechanism, to "characterize sensory hearing loss most effectively". They used stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE) generated mainly by linear reflection from irregularities, and distortion-product OAE (DPOAE) whose primary source is nonlinear distortion. Transient-evoked OAE (TEOAE) is another type of reflection source OAEs and we aim to investigate whether this type of OAE could be used in the joint OAE profile instead of SFOAEs. We employed a nonlinear cochlear model to compare I/O functions of click-evoked OAEs (CEOAEs) simulated with the linear extraction method, which requires the use of a suitable window to remove the evoking click, and nonlinear extraction method, which removes the click by subtracting the click response from the scaled response evoked with a click of higher intensity. Despite the fact that the nonlinear method removes everything that grows linearly, the amplitude of simulated CEOAE I/O functions saturated at roughly the same stimulus levels for compressors 6 and 9.54 dB above the probe level. The amplitude fine structure and phase slope of CEOAEs were qualitatively equivalent for both extraction methods. We found qualitatively similar results in measured CEOAEs.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10307 - Acoustics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GC23-07621J" target="_blank" >GC23-07621J: Otoacoustic emissions in normal cochlea and cochlea with endolymphatic hydrops: modeling and experiments</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů