All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Local Error Analysis and Comparison of the Swept- and Intersection-Based Remapping Methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21340%2F17%3A00308990" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21340/17:00308990 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/communications-in-computational-physics/article/div-classtitlelocal-error-analysis-and-comparison-of-the-swept-and-intersection-based-remapping-methodsdiv/7E9FDB586152939AA11C343863A45A1C" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/communications-in-computational-physics/article/div-classtitlelocal-error-analysis-and-comparison-of-the-swept-and-intersection-based-remapping-methodsdiv/7E9FDB586152939AA11C343863A45A1C</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2015-0021" target="_blank" >10.4208/cicp.OA-2015-0021</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Local Error Analysis and Comparison of the Swept- and Intersection-Based Remapping Methods

  • Original language description

    In this paper, the numerical error of two widely used methods for remapping of discrete quantities from one computational mesh to another is investigated. We compare the intuitive, but resource intensive method utilizing intersections of computational cells with the faster and simpler swept-region-based method. Both algorithms are formally second order accurate, however, they are known to produce slightly different quantity profiles in practical applications. The second-order estimate of the error formula is constructed algebraically for both algorithms so that their local accuracy can be evaluated. This general estimate is then used to assess the dependence of the performance of both methods on parameters such as the second derivatives of the remapped distribution, mesh geometry or mesh movement. Due to the complexity of such analysis, it is performed on a set of simplified elementary mesh patterns such as cell corner expansion, rotation or shear. On selected numerical tests it is demonstrated that the swept-based method can distort a symmetric quantity distribution more substantially than the intersection-based approach when the computational mesh moves in an unsuitable direction.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10101 - Pure mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA14-21318S" target="_blank" >GA14-21318S: Lagrangian and ALE methods for mechanics of compressible fluids and elastic-plastic solids</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Communications in Computational Physics

  • ISSN

    1815-2406

  • e-ISSN

    1991-7120

  • Volume of the periodical

    21

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CN - CHINA

  • Number of pages

    33

  • Pages from-to

    526-558

  • UT code for WoS article

    000395527500009

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85012919515