All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Complexity Conflict in Research and Practice: The Case of Public-Private Interface Configuration

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21450%2F25%3A00377884" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21450/25:00377884 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Complexity Conflict in Research and Practice: The Case of Public-Private Interface Configuration

  • Original language description

    The disassociation between research and practice in architecture and urban design is a recognised issue, leading to an ongoing academic debate on the credibility of the field.Most authors agree that the irreducible nature of the practice, the complexity of the built environment itself, and its indirect and multidisciplinary shaping processes render the applicability of gained knowledge problematic, as researchers are inherently confronted with the dilemma of rigour vs. relevance. This paper explores the relevance of architectural research and constraints to the application of theoretical knowledge in practice in a particular case of urban interface. It discusses the benefits and limits of planning and design tools derived from the theoretically described causal relationship between the physical configuration of the public-private interface and its social effects on users of the adjacent public space. Through a conceptualization of the process, the article illustrates that the application of theoretical knowledge in urban design and planning can be significantly improved by considering the factors of scale and spatial context as well as the forming forces, values, and motivations of the actors involved. This theoretical dissection aims to clarify the contradiction between theoretical values and subsequent practice to help promote not universally good but, more essentially, adequate, sustainable, and equitable spaces.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50702 - Urban studies (planning and development)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    School of Architecture(s) - New Frontiers of Architectural Education: EAAE Annual Conference—Turin 2023

  • ISBN

    978-3-031-71959-2

  • ISSN

    2661-8184

  • e-ISSN

    2661-8192

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    242-250

  • Publisher name

    Springer, Cham

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Torino

  • Event date

    Aug 30, 2023

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    001435604500027