The Complexity Conflict in Research and Practice: The Case of Public-Private Interface Configuration
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21450%2F25%3A00377884" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21450/25:00377884 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-71959-2_27</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Complexity Conflict in Research and Practice: The Case of Public-Private Interface Configuration
Original language description
The disassociation between research and practice in architecture and urban design is a recognised issue, leading to an ongoing academic debate on the credibility of the field.Most authors agree that the irreducible nature of the practice, the complexity of the built environment itself, and its indirect and multidisciplinary shaping processes render the applicability of gained knowledge problematic, as researchers are inherently confronted with the dilemma of rigour vs. relevance. This paper explores the relevance of architectural research and constraints to the application of theoretical knowledge in practice in a particular case of urban interface. It discusses the benefits and limits of planning and design tools derived from the theoretically described causal relationship between the physical configuration of the public-private interface and its social effects on users of the adjacent public space. Through a conceptualization of the process, the article illustrates that the application of theoretical knowledge in urban design and planning can be significantly improved by considering the factors of scale and spatial context as well as the forming forces, values, and motivations of the actors involved. This theoretical dissection aims to clarify the contradiction between theoretical values and subsequent practice to help promote not universally good but, more essentially, adequate, sustainable, and equitable spaces.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50702 - Urban studies (planning and development)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
School of Architecture(s) - New Frontiers of Architectural Education: EAAE Annual Conference—Turin 2023
ISBN
978-3-031-71959-2
ISSN
2661-8184
e-ISSN
2661-8192
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
242-250
Publisher name
Springer, Cham
Place of publication
—
Event location
Torino
Event date
Aug 30, 2023
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
001435604500027