All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Cost-Effectiveness Of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In Patients With Refractory Cardiac Arrest

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F14%3A00221211" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/14:00221211 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1435" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1435</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1435" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1435</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Cost-Effectiveness Of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In Patients With Refractory Cardiac Arrest

  • Original language description

    Objectives Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been recently introduced as a therapeutic option for refractory cardiac arrest (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation - ECPR). Despite growing evidence demonstrating improved survival rate with ECPR in refractory cardiac arrest, a number of questions remains unanswered and data on cost-effectiveness of this approach are still insufficient. Methods Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the provider's perspective. Sixteen patients undergoing ECPR were included into the analysis (ECPR group) and the data were compared with 35 subjects with conventional CPR for refractory cardiac arrest (non-ECPR group). Results In the ECPR group seven out of sixteen patients were weaned from ECMO, four of them with good neurological outcomes (CPC 1); three patients survived one year with CPC 1, one patient survived one year with severe neurological dysfunction (CPC 3) and one patient with persisting coma (CPC 4). In comparison

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

    FQ - Public health system, social medicine

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NT11532" target="_blank" >NT11532: Medical Technology Assessment</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2014

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů