All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Economics And Clinical Evaluation Of Endovascular And Surgical Treatment Of Patients With Disability Of Superficial Femoral Artery

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F14%3A00221220" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/14:00221220 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1402" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1402</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1402" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1402</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Economics And Clinical Evaluation Of Endovascular And Surgical Treatment Of Patients With Disability Of Superficial Femoral Artery

  • Original language description

    With the increasing price of modern instrumentation, it is appropriate to evaluate not only clinical efficiency, but also intervention economics. This study aims to create a recommendation for choosing the most effective treatment based on both economicdata and clinical outputs of the disabled superficial femoral artery. The methods chosen were reviewed from clinical outputs for treatment effectiveness, multiple-criteria decision-making for the synthesis of treatment effects, analysis of costs at the selected interventions and cost-effectiveness analysis. The four clinical outputs used in the study as a criterion by the research of the clinical studies were primary patency, technical success, patient survival and limb salvage at the year of operation.The weights of each criterion, and the preferences of the interventions were counted. The sequence of interventions was set by the AHP method: PTA (35.6%), PTA/S (33.9%) and bypass (30.6%) and method of weighted sum: PTA/S (56%), bypass

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

    AE - Management, administration and clerical work

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NT11532" target="_blank" >NT11532: Medical Technology Assessment</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2014

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů