Center of Ventilation-Methods of Calculation using Electrical Impedance Tomography and the Influence of Image Segmentation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F16%3A00304278" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/16:00304278 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_241" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_241</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_241" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_241</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Center of Ventilation-Methods of Calculation using Electrical Impedance Tomography and the Influence of Image Segmentation
Original language description
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a promising non-invasive, radiation-free imaging modality. Using EIT-derived index Center of ventilation (CoV), ventral-to-dorsal shifts in distribution of lung ventilation can be assessed. The methods of CoV calculation differ among authors and so does the segmentation of EIT images from which the CoV is calculated. The aim of this study is to compare the values of CoV obtained using different algorithms, applied in variously segmented EIT images. An animal trial (n=4) with anesthetized mechanically ventilated pigs was conducted. In one animal, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was induced by repeated whole lung lavage. Incremental steps in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), each with a value of 5 cmH(2)O (or 4 cmH(2)O in the ARDS model), were performed to reach total PEEP level of 25 cmH(2)O (or 22 cmH(2)O in the ARDS model). EIT data were acquired continuously during this PEEP trial. From each PEEP level, 30 tidal variation (TV) images were used for analysis. Functional regions of interest (ROI) were defined based on the standard deviation (SD) of pixel values, using threshold 15%-35% of maximum pixel SD. The results of this study show that there might be statistically significant differences between the values obtained using different methods for calculation of CoV. The differences occured in healthy animals as well as in the ARDS model. Both investigated algorithms are relatively insensitive to the image segmentation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
FS - Medical facilities, apparatus and equipment
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
XIV MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING 2016
ISBN
978-3-319-32703-7
ISSN
1680-0737
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
1258-1263
Publisher name
Springer
Place of publication
New York
Event location
Paphos
Event date
Mar 31, 2016
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
000376283000241