Evaluation of Psychological Load of Air Defense Members by Physiological Data Monitoring Compared to the Questionnaire Evaluation Method
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F20%3A00349232" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/20:00349232 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626" target="_blank" >10.1109/ME49197.2020.9286626</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of Psychological Load of Air Defense Members by Physiological Data Monitoring Compared to the Questionnaire Evaluation Method
Original language description
This paper aims to evaluate psychological load assessment methods in air defense members. The study is based on physiological data monitoring and compares this method with traditional questionnaire evaluation methods. Measurement using a biotelemetric system was conducted while training in flight simulators. A total of 28 subjects/soldiers were divided into seven four-member teams consisting of two pilots, an air traffic controller and a member of ground support. Physiological data was collected and monitored for all subjects during a mission flight operation. Calculations of the R-R interval length and respiratory rate were performed for all soldiers involved. Statistical analysis, i.e. the calculation of the median, maximum, minimum, first quartile and third quartile were used for physiological data presentation and the quantitative evaluation of mental stress. These results were then compared with results showing the subjective degree of psychological stress load, as determined by the questionnaire evaluation method. A simple rating scales repeatedly evaluated by individual subjects were used to determine their subjective level of mental stress before and after individual phases of the training.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20601 - Medical engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
2020 19th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME)
ISBN
978-1-7281-5601-9
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
—
Publisher name
IEEE
Place of publication
Piscataway (New Jersey)
Event location
Praha
Event date
Dec 2, 2020
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—