Reframing planning theory in terms of five categories of questions

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21630%2F16%3A00301597" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21630/16:00301597 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392" target="_blank" >10.1177/1473095214525392</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reframing planning theory in terms of five categories of questions
Original language description
This article investigates how planning is influenced by five categories of questions (what, who, when/where, how and why) and the interactions between them. Planning theories differ in their answers to these questions, but all of them are primarily built around an assumed connection between the questions of `what’ and `how’. This orthodox assumption of a `what–how’ connection is shown to be responsible for the failure of planning theories in practice and their inability to address issues of power. The article illustrates that both ends and means (`what’ and `how’) are predefined by answers to three fundamental questions (`who’, `when/where’ and `why’) and that there is no direct connection between `what’ and `how’ in practice.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AE - Management, administration and clerical work
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)