All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

EXPERIENCE WITH SEVERAL QUALITATIVE EVALUATION METHODS IN EDUCATION

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21630%2F22%3A00362610" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21630/22:00362610 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1171" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1171</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1171" target="_blank" >10.21125/iceri.2022.1171</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    EXPERIENCE WITH SEVERAL QUALITATIVE EVALUATION METHODS IN EDUCATION

  • Original language description

    Educational projects and programs are expected to bring long term impacts for a target group. The results are usually not visible immediately after the education or training but rather need more time and effort to identify and assess the benefits of education and training in the long term. Various evaluation methods – both quantitative and qualitative - are used for finding results and impacts of educational trainings and programs. This paper brings an experience of the authors with using various qualitative methods in evaluating educational and training projects and programs realized mainly within the European Cohesion policy. The paper discusses suitability, usability and limitations of several qualitative evaluation methods like the Most Significant Change, Case Studies, Outcome Harvesting, and others. Main pros and cons of the qualitative methods are also mentioned. Our practical experience with the above mentioned methods can serve as a guide or recommendation for education providers in setting up a framework for evaluation of realized educational and training projects and programs.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    ICERI2022 Proceedings

  • ISBN

    978-84-09-45476-1

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    2340-1095

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    4859-4864

  • Publisher name

    IATED Academy

  • Place of publication

    Valencia

  • Event location

    Seville

  • Event date

    Nov 7, 2022

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article