All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Two new 222Rn Emanation Sources – a Comparison Study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70565813%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000004" target="_blank" >RIV/70565813:_____/24:N0000004 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/2055/2024/" target="_blank" >https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/2055/2024/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024" target="_blank" >10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Two new 222Rn Emanation Sources – a Comparison Study

  • Original language description

    More than 50 % of naturally occurring radiation exposure to the general public is due to the noble gas radon (222Rn) and its progenies, causing considerable health risks. Therefore, the European Union has implemented Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM to measure 222Rn activity concentrations and to identify radon priority areas (RPAs) to specify areas where countermeasures are most needed. Although 222Rn measurements are far spread across Europe, traceability to the International System of Units (SI) is still lacking for radon activity concentrations below 300 Bq m−3. Consequently, measurement results cannot be reliably compared with each other. The European Metrology Research Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) 19ENV01 traceRadon project aimed to address this issue and has developed two new 222Rn emanation sources, intended to be used as calibration standards for reference instruments. The goal of this paper is to investigate and compare the two sources to ensure their quality by comparing the calibration factors estimated from both sources for the same reference instrument. This was done for three reference instruments in total at two experimental sites. Differences in calibration factors for one reference instrument of up to 0.07 were derived. Despite the small differences between the calibration factors, all uncertainties are well within the intended target uncertainty of 10 % for kCombining double low line1..

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10700 - Other natural sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

  • ISSN

    1867-1381

  • e-ISSN

    1867-8548

  • Volume of the periodical

    17

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    7

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    2055–2065

  • UT code for WoS article

    001199962600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85190599239