All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28110%2F16%3A43874510" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28110/16:43874510 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.004</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Effect of a broad-spectrum LED curing light on the Knoop microhardness of four posterior resin based composites at 2, 4 and 6-mm depths

  • Original language description

    Objective: To measure the Knoop microhardness at the bottom of four posterior resin-based composites (RBCs): Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent), SureFil SDR flow (DENTSPLY), SonicFill (Kerr), and xtra fil (Voco). Methods: The RBCs were expressed into metal rings that were 2, 4, or 6-mm thick with a 4-mm internal diameter at 30 degrees C. The uncured specimens were covered by a Mylar strip and a Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent) polywave (R) LED light-curing unit was used in high power setting for 20 s. The specimens were then removed and placed immediately on a Knoop microhardness-testing device and the microhardness was measured at 9 points across top and bottom surfaces of each specimen. Five specimens were made for each condition. Results: As expected, for each RBC there was no significant difference in the microhardness values at the top of the 2, 4 and 6-mm thick specimens. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest resin, but was the only resin that had no significant difference between the KHN values at the bottom of the 2 and 4-mm (Mixed Model ANOVA p < 0.05). Although the KHN of SureFil SDR Flow was only marginally significantly different between the 2 and 6-mm thickness, the bottom at 6-mm was only 59% of the hardness measured at the top. Clinical significance: This study highlights that clinicians need to consider how the depth of cure was evaluated when determining the depth of cure. SureFil SDR Flow was the softest material and, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, this RBC should be overlaid with a conventional resin.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    JI - Composite materials

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Dentistry

  • ISSN

    0300-5712

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    45

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Neuveden

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    14-18

  • UT code for WoS article

    000370822800003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84950114200