All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A comparative evaluation of validation techniques in software effort estimation using eSOMCOCOMO

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28140%2F25%3A63600320" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28140/25:63600320 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-00239-6_23" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-00239-6_23</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00239-6_23" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-032-00239-6_23</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A comparative evaluation of validation techniques in software effort estimation using eSOMCOCOMO

  • Original language description

    This study investigates the impact of different validation techniques on the performance evaluation of software effort estimation models. Specifically, it compares k-fold cross-validation, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), and hold-out validation using the eSOMCOCOMO approach, which enhances COCOMO model predictions through the Self-Organizing Migrating Algorithm (SOMA). The evaluation was conducted on three benchmark datasets (NASA18, Kemerer, and Miyazaki94) and assessed using standard evaluation metrics (MMRE, PRED(25), MMER, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and R2). Statistical hypothesis testing revealed significant differences among most validation techniques, except in the comparison conducted on the NASA18 dataset. LOOCV demonstrates superior stability across multiple runs, whereas hold-out validation showed high variance.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

  • ISBN

    978-3-032-00238-9

  • ISSN

    2367-3370

  • e-ISSN

    2367-3389

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    337-352

  • Publisher name

    Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

  • Place of publication

    Berlín

  • Event location

    Virtual, Online

  • Event date

    Apr 1, 2025

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article