All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Selected Aspects of Social and Legal Protection of Children: Expert Approach versus Public Opinion

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F16%3A43874694" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/16:43874694 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://soced.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Selected-Aspects-of-Social-and-Legal-Protection-ScEd-Sona-Vavrova-Jitka-Vaculikova-Jan-Kalenda.pdf" target="_blank" >http://soced.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Selected-Aspects-of-Social-and-Legal-Protection-ScEd-Sona-Vavrova-Jitka-Vaculikova-Jan-Kalenda.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/soced.2016.04.02.04" target="_blank" >10.7441/soced.2016.04.02.04</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Selected Aspects of Social and Legal Protection of Children: Expert Approach versus Public Opinion

  • Original language description

    Social and legal protection of children can be approached from two general positions. The first is expert discourse in the form of various scientific schools or epistemic communities and the other is the position of public opinion. The purpose of this study is to show both the coexistence and potential contradictory nature of these two approaches on selected current issues of social and legal protection of children (boundary of criminal liability, institutional or protective care and replacement care of parentless children). While mapping the expert discourse is based on scientific knowledge of the issue, mapping the public opinion uses data of a representative inquiry aimed at the study of opinions of the Czech population in 2015 (n = 1.050). The study concludes that though public opinion and expert discourse regarding the replacement care of parentless children are to some extent in agreement, there is a difference of opinion on the boundary of criminal liability and institutional or protective care of children and youth with problematic behaviour.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AM - Pedagogy and education

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Sociální pedagogika

  • ISSN

    1805-8825

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    4

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2/2016

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    56-74

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database