Selected Aspects of Social and Legal Protection of Children: Expert Approach versus Public Opinion
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F16%3A43874694" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/16:43874694 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://soced.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Selected-Aspects-of-Social-and-Legal-Protection-ScEd-Sona-Vavrova-Jitka-Vaculikova-Jan-Kalenda.pdf" target="_blank" >http://soced.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Selected-Aspects-of-Social-and-Legal-Protection-ScEd-Sona-Vavrova-Jitka-Vaculikova-Jan-Kalenda.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/soced.2016.04.02.04" target="_blank" >10.7441/soced.2016.04.02.04</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Selected Aspects of Social and Legal Protection of Children: Expert Approach versus Public Opinion
Original language description
Social and legal protection of children can be approached from two general positions. The first is expert discourse in the form of various scientific schools or epistemic communities and the other is the position of public opinion. The purpose of this study is to show both the coexistence and potential contradictory nature of these two approaches on selected current issues of social and legal protection of children (boundary of criminal liability, institutional or protective care and replacement care of parentless children). While mapping the expert discourse is based on scientific knowledge of the issue, mapping the public opinion uses data of a representative inquiry aimed at the study of opinions of the Czech population in 2015 (n = 1.050). The study concludes that though public opinion and expert discourse regarding the replacement care of parentless children are to some extent in agreement, there is a difference of opinion on the boundary of criminal liability and institutional or protective care of children and youth with problematic behaviour.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AM - Pedagogy and education
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Sociální pedagogika
ISSN
1805-8825
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
4
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2/2016
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
19
Pages from-to
56-74
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—