Latest developments in minimally invasive spinal treatment in Slovakia and its comparison with an open approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F23%3A63566098" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/23:63566098 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755" target="_blank" >10.3390/jcm12144755</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Latest developments in minimally invasive spinal treatment in Slovakia and its comparison with an open approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Original language description

The study describes the benefits of MIS-TLIF (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) and compares them with OTLIF (open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion). It compares blood loss, length of hospitalization stays (LOS), operation time, and return of the patient to the environment. A total of 250 adults (109 males and 141 females), mean age 59.5 &amp; PLUSMN; 12.6, who underwent MIS-TLIF in the Neurosurgery Clinic (NSC) Ruzomberok, Slovakia, because of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD), participated in this retrospective study. Data were obtained from the patients&apos; medical records and from the standardized Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) index questionnaire. To compare ODI in our study sample, we used the Student&apos;s Paired Sample Test. To compare the MIS-TLIF and OTLIF approaches, a meta-analysis was conducted. Confidence intervals were 95% CI. The test of homogeneity (Chi-square (Q)) and the degree of heterogeneity (I-2 test) among the included studies were used. Statistical analyses were two-sided (&amp; alpha; = 0.05). All monitored parameters were significantly better in MIS-TLIF group: blood loss (p &lt; 0.001), operation time (p &lt; 0.001), and ODI changes (p &lt; 0.001). LOS (p &lt; 0.042) were close to the significance level. ODI in the study sample decreased by 33.44% points after MIS-TLIF, and it significantly increased as well (p &lt; 0.001). The percentage of patients who were satisfied with the surgery they underwent was 84.8%. The study confirmed that the MIS-TLIF method is in general gentler for the patient and allows the faster regeneration of patient&apos;s health status compared to OTLIF.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30218 - General and internal medicine

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN

2077-0383

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

12

Issue of the periodical within the volume

14

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

19

Pages from-to

—

UT code for WoS article

001035875900001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85166348932