Revisiting the triadic classification of learning activities: rethinking their measurement
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F25%3A63594678" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/25:63594678 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506?needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506?needAccess=true</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506" target="_blank" >10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Revisiting the triadic classification of learning activities: rethinking their measurement
Original language description
International organisations have measured adult learning participation since the 1990s, using surveys like the Adult Education Survey (AES) and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). These surveys employ a ‘triadic’ classification of learning activities–formal (FAE), non-formal (NFE) and informal learning (IFL)–to compare participation rates. However, historical and conceptual advancements have highlighted that these categories often overlap, challenging their validity and reliability. Despite this, the triadic classification remains in use, raising concerns about the accuracy of participation data. This article critically examines the continued use of the triadic classification, arguing for a conceptual shift to better reflect the contemporary learning landscape. We review the evolution of the triadic conceptualisation, particularly within the EC’s Classification of Learning Activities (CLA), and critique its practical application in the recent AES (2022) survey. Based on our critique, we propose two alternative scenarios: (1) treating learning categories as fuzzy, overlapping concepts, and (2) conceptualising learning activities along a continuum of formality/informality. We conclude by discussing the implications of these scenarios for future data collection and measurement practices, advocating for instruments that adapt to the evolving digital and blended learning landscapes accelerated by the pandemic.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Lifelong Education
ISSN
0260-1370
e-ISSN
1464-519X
Volume of the periodical
44
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
257-272
UT code for WoS article
001462050700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105002632693