All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Revisiting the triadic classification of learning activities: rethinking their measurement

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F25%3A63594678" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/25:63594678 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506?needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506?needAccess=true</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506" target="_blank" >10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Revisiting the triadic classification of learning activities: rethinking their measurement

  • Original language description

    International organisations have measured adult learning participation since the 1990s, using surveys like the Adult Education Survey (AES) and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). These surveys employ a ‘triadic’ classification of learning activities–formal (FAE), non-formal (NFE) and informal learning (IFL)–to compare participation rates. However, historical and conceptual advancements have highlighted that these categories often overlap, challenging their validity and reliability. Despite this, the triadic classification remains in use, raising concerns about the accuracy of participation data. This article critically examines the continued use of the triadic classification, arguing for a conceptual shift to better reflect the contemporary learning landscape. We review the evolution of the triadic conceptualisation, particularly within the EC’s Classification of Learning Activities (CLA), and critique its practical application in the recent AES (2022) survey. Based on our critique, we propose two alternative scenarios: (1) treating learning categories as fuzzy, overlapping concepts, and (2) conceptualising learning activities along a continuum of formality/informality. We conclude by discussing the implications of these scenarios for future data collection and measurement practices, advocating for instruments that adapt to the evolving digital and blended learning landscapes accelerated by the pandemic.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal of Lifelong Education

  • ISSN

    0260-1370

  • e-ISSN

    1464-519X

  • Volume of the periodical

    44

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    257-272

  • UT code for WoS article

    001462050700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105002632693