All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification modified classification

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F71226401%3A_____%2F20%3AN0100378" target="_blank" >RIV/71226401:_____/20:N0100378 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joa.13233" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joa.13233</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13233" target="_blank" >10.1111/joa.13233</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification modified classification

  • Original language description

    Accessory bones in the region of the elbow are rare variants with high clinical significance as they may be confused with avulsion fractures. We investigated their prevalence and performed a statistical analysis to support their congenital origin. Their localization was mapped to show their exact site of occurrence. We evaluated anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of 2413 elbows in a Central European population from which a group of accessory bony structures was selected. Their character was evaluated, and accessory bones were identified. We used logistic regression to evaluate the potential relationship between the occurrence of accessory bones, the age of patients, and the occurrence of calcar olecrani. The prevalence of accessory bones of the elbow in the sample was 0.77%. Our results did not show a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of calcar olecrani or with the age of patients. The most common type was os subepicondylare mediale (type V) in 0.46%, which was located distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus, followed by os subepicondylare laterale (type III; 0.21%), situated laterally to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In comparison with previous reports, os sesamoideum mediale (type IV) was located more distally. Our data suggest that congenital accessory bones are a rare entity. Knowledge of their exact localization should be considered during diagnosis of avulsion fractures and other unclear diagnoses including accessory bony structures in the elbow region.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30106 - Anatomy and morphology (plant science to be 1.6)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Anatomy

  • ISSN

    1469-7580

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    237

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    5

  • Pages from-to

    618-622

  • UT code for WoS article

    000561990500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85089730676