A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F17%3A00484914" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/17:00484914 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas
Original language description
To address challenges associated with climate resilience, health and well-being in urban areas, current policy platforms are shifting their focus from ecosystem-based to nature- based solutions (NBS), broadly defined as solutions to societal challenges that are inspired and supported by nature. NBS result in the provision of co-benefits, such as the improvement of place attractiveness, of health and quality of life, and creation of green jobs. Few frameworks exist for acknowledging and assessing the value of such co-benefits of NBS and to guide cross-sectoral project and policy design and implementation. In this paper, we firstly developed a holistic framework for assessing co-benefits (and costs) of NBS across elements of socio-cultural and socio-economic systems, biodiversity, ecosystems and climate. The framework was guided by a review of over 1700 documents from science and practice within and across 10 societal challenges relevant to cities globally. We found that NBS can have environmental, social and economic co-benefits and/or costs both within and across these 10 societal challenges. On that base, we develop and propose a seven-stage process for situating co-benefit assessment within policy and project implementation. The seven stages include: 1) identify problem or opportunity, 2) select and assess NBS and related actions, 3) design NBS implementation processes, 4) implement NBS, 5) frequently engage stakeholders and communicate co-benefits, 6) transfer and upscale NBS, and 7) monitor and evaluate co-benefits across all stages. We conclude that the developed framework together with the seven-stage co-benefit assessment process represent a valuable tool for guiding thinking and identifying the multiple values of NBS implementation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Environmental Science & Policy
ISSN
1462-9011
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
77
Issue of the periodical within the volume
nov
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
15-24
UT code for WoS article
000413281800003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85025591068