Using MCA tools for evaluating community-managed forests from a green economy perspective: lessons from Nepal
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F19%3A00511453" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/19:00511453 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://asep.lib.cas.cz/arl-cav/cs/vysledky/?field=T001N&term=0511453&search=Naj%C3%ADt&op=result&zf=&sort=&guide=" target="_blank" >https://asep.lib.cas.cz/arl-cav/cs/vysledky/?field=T001N&term=0511453&search=Naj%C3%ADt&op=result&zf=&sort=&guide=</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1652858" target="_blank" >10.1080/13504509.2019.1652858</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Using MCA tools for evaluating community-managed forests from a green economy perspective: lessons from Nepal
Original language description
Nepal is in the process of formulating its forest policies at the provincial level . Various community-managed forests have been designed in the past by the Nepal government to decentralize the forest for its sustainable management practice. This study facilitates the process of identifying appropriate forest management options in two of the provinces, namely Provinces Three and Gandaki. Four forest management options passive, active, scientific and multiple were identified following the existing management practices. For the evaluation of the overall performance of the options, a framework with three criteria, 10 indicators and 28 verifiers were designed. The framework followed the green economy perspective considering the improvement of the forest conditions, economic and social well-being, and low carbon emission. The Analytical Hierarchy Process was used to prioritize the best management option and analyse trade-offs to guide future decision-making and reduce the risk of unwanted consequences. Our results show that the elicitation of preferences for the evaluation criteria varied by stakeholder groups. Their preference was largely guided by improving the forest resource condition and economic well-being. Foresters prefer scientific and active forest management, policymakers prefer multiple-use forest management and scientific management, whereas community forest user groups prefer active forest management. We argue that a scientific management approach may contribute better to economic aspects, although it may often compromise the other aspects. The multiple forest management option seems to be the best for green economy considering ecological, economic and social consequences.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LO1415" target="_blank" >LO1415: CzechGlobe 2020 – Development of the Centre of Global Climate Change Impacts Studies</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
ISSN
1350-4509
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
26
Issue of the periodical within the volume
AUG 2019
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
672-683
UT code for WoS article
000481448300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85070883184