Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F22%3A00558028" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/22:00558028 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/44555601:13440/22:43896904 RIV/44555601:13510/22:43896904
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722002985" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722002985</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach
Original language description
The major event that hit Europe in summer 2021 reminds society that floods are recurrent and among the costliest and deadliest natural hazards. The long-term flood risk management (FRM) efforts preferring sole technical measures to prevent and mitigate floods have shown to be not sufficiently effective and sensitive to the environment. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) mark a recent paradigm shift of FRM towards solutions that use nature-derived features, processes and management options to improve water retention and mitigate floods. Yet, the empirical evidence on the effects of NBS across various settings remains fragmented and their implementation faces a series of institutional barriers. In this paper, we adopt a community expert perspective drawing upon LAND4FLOOD Natural flood retention on private land network (https://www.land4flood.eu) in order to identify a set of barriers and their cascading and compound interactions relevant to individual NBS. The experts identified a comprehensive set of 17 barriers affecting the implementation of 12 groups of NBS in both urban and rural settings in five European regional environmental domains (i.e., Boreal, Atlantic, Continental, Alpine-Carpathian, and Mediterranean). Based on the results, we define avenues for further research, connecting hydrology and soil science, on the one hand, and land use planning, social geography and economics, on the other. Our suggestions ultimately call for a transdisciplinary turn in the research of NBS in FRM.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LTC18025" target="_blank" >LTC18025: LAND4FLOOD: Natural Flood Retention on Private Land</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Environmental Management
ISSN
0301-4797
e-ISSN
1095-8630
Volume of the periodical
310
Issue of the periodical within the volume
MAY
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
114725
UT code for WoS article
000798919300005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85124971003