All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

O and A soil horizons' boundaries detection using GPR under variable soil moisture conditions

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F22%3A00559011" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/22:00559011 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706122002415?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706122002415?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115934" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115934</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    O and A soil horizons' boundaries detection using GPR under variable soil moisture conditions

  • Original language description

    The thicknesses of organic (O) and organomineral (A) horizons are essential parameters for estimating the soil organic carbon stock. They are usually measured at sampling points distributed randomly or regularly over a site, but due to high spatial variability of the soil horizons' thicknesses, the sampling should be dense enough to estimate the carbon stock precisely. Dense soil sampling is cost, time, and labour demanding. Therefore, some studies suggest that geophysical methods such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can assist with a more precise estimation of the organic and organomineral horizons thicknesses without digging soil pits. This study evaluates the accuracy of the organic and the organomineral horizons thicknesses repeatedly measured under different soil moisture conditions on two contrasting soil types: Dystric Cambisol and Arenic Podzosol, using GPR with 800 MHz antenna. The results proved this method to be promising, however, we could not distinguish the boundary between organic and organomineral horizons but only the O + A horizon/subsoil boundary. The thickness of O + A horizons was estimated with an error between 25 and 35% in the Dystric Cambisol site and 18 24% in the Arenic Podzol site. The results were more accurate under moister conditions for both soil types, but under drier conditions, deeper parts of irregular horizon boundaries were better distinguishable.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40101 - Agriculture

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LM2018123" target="_blank" >LM2018123: CzeCOS</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Geoderma

  • ISSN

    0016-7061

  • e-ISSN

    1872-6259

  • Volume of the periodical

    422

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    SEP

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    115934

  • UT code for WoS article

    000812224500004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85133901046