Participation as a pathway to pluralism: A critical view over diverse disciplines
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F22%3A00566457" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/22:00566457 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11240/22:10447113
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S006525042200006X" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S006525042200006X</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.04.006" target="_blank" >10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.04.006</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Participation as a pathway to pluralism: A critical view over diverse disciplines
Original language description
Wider participation in ecosystem governance has been called for as a means to reach pluralism in biodiversity conservation research and practice. The logical arguments given are that plurality in worldviews, priorities and values (social plurality) should be brought to the table to be reflected in decision-making, via participation. In this chapter, we give critical insight into participation as a pathway to recognizing social plurality in ecosystem governance. We highlight how different disciplines, beyond ecology, have tackled the topic of participation,including development studies and anthropology, governance and policy studies and transformations/transitions research. We look across this diverse literature to understand the ways in which different participatory approaches contribute to ecosystem governance. We outline how governance systems create multiple spaces for participation. We then explore key challenges faced when working within these spaces with the intention of addressing social plurality. We discuss challenges of complexity, inclusion, conflict and power. In doing so, we present an argument that participation itself must be plural, in order to reflect the positioning within the governance system, and the context of power that it is taking place within. In recognizing that participation as a pathway to plurality cannot be a prescriptive process, we provide seven reflexive questions to steer its design and implementation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Advances in Ecological Research
ISSN
0065-2504
e-ISSN
2163-582X
Volume of the periodical
66
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
24
Pages from-to
175-199
UT code for WoS article
000893668200008
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85130387087