All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F23%3A00569751" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/23:00569751 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14230/23:00131762 RIV/00216208:11240/23:10466238 RIV/61989592:15310/23:73622988

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01530-3" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01530-3</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

  • Original language description

    Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/TL02000520" target="_blank" >TL02000520: Landscape cultural ecosystem services assessment and mapping</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS

  • ISSN

    2662-9992

  • e-ISSN

    2662-9992

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    45

  • UT code for WoS article

    000925713000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85147423927