Proposal and extensive test of a calibration protocol for crop phenology models
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F23%3A00574033" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/23:00574033 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00900-0" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00900-0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00900-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s13593-023-00900-0</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Proposal and extensive test of a calibration protocol for crop phenology models
Original language description
A major effect of environment on crops is through crop phenology, and therefore, the capacity to predict phenology for new environments is important. Mechanistic crop models are a major tool for such predictions, but calibration of crop phenology models is difficult and there is no consensus on the best approach. We propose an original, detailed approach for calibration of such models, which we refer to as a calibration protocol. The protocol covers all the steps in the calibration workflow, namely choice of default parameter values, choice of objective function, choice of parameters to estimate from the data, calculation of optimal parameter values, and diagnostics. The major innovation is in the choice of which parameters to estimate from the data, which combines expert knowledge and data-based model selection. First, almost additive parameters are identified and estimated. This should make bias (average difference between observed and simulated values) nearly zero. These are ,,obligatory,, parameters, that will definitely be estimated. Then candidate parameters are identified, which are parameters likely to explain the remaining discrepancies between simulated and observed values. A candidate is only added to the list of parameters to estimate if it leads to a reduction in BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion), which is a model selection criterion. A second original aspect of the protocol is the specification of documentation for each stage of the protocol. The protocol was applied by 19 modeling teams to three data sets for wheat phenology. All teams first calibrated their model using their ,,usual,, calibration approach, so it was possible to compare usual and protocol calibration. Evaluation of prediction error was based on data from sites and years not represented in the training data. Compared to usual calibration, calibration following the new protocol reduced the variability between modeling teams by 22% and reduced prediction error by 11%.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10611 - Plant sciences, botany
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000797" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000797: SustES - Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem services and food security under adverse environmental conditions</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
ISSN
1774-0746
e-ISSN
1773-0155
Volume of the periodical
43
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
46
UT code for WoS article
001028161100003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85165277995