All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Cross model validation for a diversified cropping system

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F24%3A00587381" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/24:00587381 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001023?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001023?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127181" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.eja.2024.127181</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Cross model validation for a diversified cropping system

  • Original language description

    Crop diversification is gaining traction due to the positive benefits in the delivery of ecosystem services (ESS) and the promotion of biodiversity. Agroecosystem simulation models can contribute to the design of diversified cropping systems but require calibration and validation before they can be applied. However, data availability is still very limited, particularly for diversified cropping systems. Therefore, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Nelder-Mead optimization method and the leaveoneout (LOO) validation method to calibrate and validate a diversified cropping system with a limited dataset, by using either a fixed year combination for calibration and validation for all crops or using a flexible year combination for every crop. Crop phenology was manually calibrated for all year combinations and the best parameter set based on the LOOvalidation was selected for the subsequent step. Next, a fourparameter set related to crop growth and biomass dynamics was chosen for parameter optimization in the calibration step. To measure model performance during both steps, the root mean square error (RMSE) in days was used for phenology and a weighed relative RMSE (RRMSE) was used for crop growth, with the intermediate and final biomass contributing to 50% of the error and the other 50% corresponding to grain yield. Data for model comparison was collected at the patchCROP landscape experiment in Brandenburg, Germany. Observed data included daily weather, soil information, crop phenology, intermediate and final above ground biomass and grain yield for summer seasons 2020, 2021, and 2022 and winter seasons 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 (referred as 2021 and 2022, respectively). Summer crops included maize, soybean, lupine and sunflower, while winter crops were wheat, barley, rye and rapeseed. Results showed that the Nelder-Mead method was successful in reducing the error between observed and simulated data. As for the LOOvalidation, the method showed that different year combinations led to a similar RMSE for phenology. However, for crop growth, optimum year combination was critical, as it differed for all summer crops but not for winter crops. For the summer crops, the lowest errors in the LOOvalidation were observed in lupine, maize and soybean, with <20.6% RRMSE, while sunflower resulted in a reasonable LOOvalidated value with 31.2% RRMSE, but a poor performance in the calibration step with 68.7% RRMSE. For the winter crops, the 2022 calibration year and the 2021 validation year combination resulted in the lowest RRMSE for wheat, barley and rapeseed. However, for rye, both year combinations led to a large error, with the lowest error when using the 2021 season for calibration (65.9% RRMSE) and 2022 season for validation (33.0% RRMSE). The flexible LOOvalidation method was useful to make optimal use of the limited dataset as it allowed a more through model testing and pointed to differences among summer and winter crops. The newly validated model has the potential to be used for the design of diversified cropping systems.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EH22_008%2F0004635" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004635: AdAgriF - Advanced methods of greenhouse gases emission reduction and sequestration in agriculture and forest landscape for climate change mitigation</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Agronomy

  • ISSN

    1161-0301

  • e-ISSN

    1873-7331

  • Volume of the periodical

    157

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    JUL

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    127181

  • UT code for WoS article

    001232153800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85190147769