Impacts of Climate Change Interventions on Biodiversity, Water, the Food System and Human Health and Well-Being
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F25%3A00639095" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/25:00639095 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11240/25:10501626
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70444?msockid=334325ca732561fb1b2b307972d4605f" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70444?msockid=334325ca732561fb1b2b307972d4605f</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70444" target="_blank" >10.1111/gcb.70444</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Impacts of Climate Change Interventions on Biodiversity, Water, the Food System and Human Health and Well-Being
Original language description
Climate change threatens biodiversity, water, food and human health and well-being. Rapid, sustained mitigation and adaptation actions can benefit all these elements of the nexus. Key transitions in energy, land and marine ecosystems, urban areas, industry and society are essential for climate change mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development. These transitions require interdisciplinary research, policy support and societal engagement. Here we present an assessment of 69 response options, a subset of which (15) was used in the climate change chapter of the IPBES Nexus Assessment. We show that the majority of climate change response options for land, oceans and ecosystems, settlement and infrastructure, industrial and societal system transitions have broadly positive impacts across the nexus. However, energy system transitions show more apparent trade-offs. Most of these impacts result from energy infrastructure that would also be required for fossil fuel based systems and should be compared to the far more damaging consequences of continued fossil fuel use. Transitioning to cleaner, renewable energy sources reduces these risks and offers significant improvements across the nexus by reducing nclimate change impacts. Of the 69 response options assessed, 59% have entirely positive effects, or at least no negative ef fects, across all nexus elements and can be considered as low-risk, immediately actionable options. The remaining 41% show either negative or variable impacts on at least one nexus element. However, this does not render them unviable, rather, their nimplementation must be carefully managed. Where impacts are variable, strategies should be tailored to ensure positive outcomes, where trade-offs are unavoidable, efforts should focus on minimising negative effects and maximising synergies. Our findings suggest that prioritising policies that address the interconnected challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, land degradation, pollution, food insecurity, access to clean water, energy for all and sustainable development will deliver more effective and equitable climate action.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Global Change Biology
ISSN
1354-1013
e-ISSN
1365-2486
Volume of the periodical
31
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
28
Pages from-to
e70444
UT code for WoS article
001563641600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105014892919