All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The potential of non-native pines for timber production—a case study from afforested post-mining sites

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000062" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/24:N0000062 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60460709:41320/24:100421

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/8/1388" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/8/1388</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f15081388" target="_blank" >10.3390/f15081388</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The potential of non-native pines for timber production—a case study from afforested post-mining sites

  • Original language description

    Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) represents one of the most important commercial coniferous tree species, providing valuable timber. Due to climate change, it is experiencing serious problems in some areas, therefore, finding a suitable substitute for its wood is currently a challenge. In this study, we compared the wood quality of three different non-native pine species and Scots pine growing at the same site to ensure identical growing conditions. Black pine (Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold), a pine species native to Southern Europe, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex C. Lawson) native to North America were compared to Scots pine for selected quantitative (productivity) and qualitative (physical and mechanical) properties. Significant differences between pine species were found in all quantitative dendrometric parameters, except average diameter at breast height. The stand volume ranged from 157 m(3) ha(-1) for lodgepole pine to 356 m(3) ha(-1) for Scots pine. For qualitative characteristics, wood density, shrinkage, and compressive strength were used to find differences among species in choosing the best alternative. The highest wood density was obtained for Scots pine (458 kg m(-3)), followed by black pine with 441 kg m(-3). The density of the remaining pine species was significantly lower. Scots pine also exceeded the tested species in compressive strength (44.2 MPa). Lodgepole pine achieved the second highest value (39.3 MPa) but was statistically similar to black pine (36.5 MPa). The tested pine species exhibited similar values in shrinkage, which were statistically insignificant, ranging from 14.3% for lodgepole pine to 15.1% for Scots pine. Based on applications and preferred characteristics, black pine or lodgepole pine could serve as the Scots pine substitute in some areas. And vice versa, ponderosa pine did not attain the Scots pine wood quality.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40100 - Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Forests

  • ISSN

    1999-4907

  • e-ISSN

    1999-4907

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    1388

  • UT code for WoS article

    001307275900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85202684373