The potential of non-native pines for timber production—a case study from afforested post-mining sites
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000062" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/24:N0000062 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60460709:41320/24:100421
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/8/1388" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/8/1388</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f15081388" target="_blank" >10.3390/f15081388</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The potential of non-native pines for timber production—a case study from afforested post-mining sites
Original language description
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) represents one of the most important commercial coniferous tree species, providing valuable timber. Due to climate change, it is experiencing serious problems in some areas, therefore, finding a suitable substitute for its wood is currently a challenge. In this study, we compared the wood quality of three different non-native pine species and Scots pine growing at the same site to ensure identical growing conditions. Black pine (Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold), a pine species native to Southern Europe, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex C. Lawson) native to North America were compared to Scots pine for selected quantitative (productivity) and qualitative (physical and mechanical) properties. Significant differences between pine species were found in all quantitative dendrometric parameters, except average diameter at breast height. The stand volume ranged from 157 m(3) ha(-1) for lodgepole pine to 356 m(3) ha(-1) for Scots pine. For qualitative characteristics, wood density, shrinkage, and compressive strength were used to find differences among species in choosing the best alternative. The highest wood density was obtained for Scots pine (458 kg m(-3)), followed by black pine with 441 kg m(-3). The density of the remaining pine species was significantly lower. Scots pine also exceeded the tested species in compressive strength (44.2 MPa). Lodgepole pine achieved the second highest value (39.3 MPa) but was statistically similar to black pine (36.5 MPa). The tested pine species exhibited similar values in shrinkage, which were statistically insignificant, ranging from 14.3% for lodgepole pine to 15.1% for Scots pine. Based on applications and preferred characteristics, black pine or lodgepole pine could serve as the Scots pine substitute in some areas. And vice versa, ponderosa pine did not attain the Scots pine wood quality.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40100 - Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Forests
ISSN
1999-4907
e-ISSN
1999-4907
Volume of the periodical
15
Issue of the periodical within the volume
8
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
1388
UT code for WoS article
001307275900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85202684373