All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Net consumption method does not provide helpful insights regarding the blue water footprint of hydroelectricity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020711%3A_____%2F21%3A00005108" target="_blank" >RIV/00020711:_____/21:00005108 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107681" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107681</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107681" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107681</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Net consumption method does not provide helpful insights regarding the blue water footprint of hydroelectricity

  • Original language description

    Water footprint indicator describes direct and indirect use of waters for humanity. Three different methods are used to calculate the water footprint of electricity generation in a hydroelectric power station or the water footprint of processes associated with the operation of reservoirs. This article analyses a method referred to as &quot;net consumption&quot;, which assumes that, even before reservoir construction, there was evaporation from the area of a future reservoir. According to this method, water loss from the hydroelectric power station system is the difference between evaporation from the water reservoir surface and evaporation from the earth&apos;s surface before reservoir construction. The article presents several arguments as to why this method is wrong and should not be used as part of the methodology for calculating the water footprint of hydropower. The main arguments are: 1) the &quot;net consumption&quot; method does not describe the value of the water footprint of the product (i.e., consumption per unit of electricity), but the change in the water balance of the territory; 2) the &quot;net consumption&quot; method is not compatible with the methods of calculating the water footprint of similar products and water footprint methodology in general; 3) the &quot;net consumption&quot; method may lead to inappropriate conclusions about the sustainability of the construction and operation of a reservoir. The individual arguments are documented with examples.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10503 - Water resources

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Ecological Indicators

  • ISSN

    1470-160X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    Neuveden

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    126

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    107681

  • UT code for WoS article

    000647802000006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85103769420