Pitfalls in screening for gestational diabetes in the Czech Republic - patient survey
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F18%3A00078135" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/18:00078135 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/18:10389943 RIV/00216208:11120/18:43917708 RIV/00064165:_____/18:10389943
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cs-gynekologie.cz/casopisy/ceska-gynekologie/2018-5-12/uskali-screeningu-gestacniho-diabetu-v-ceske-republice-pruzkum-mezi-pacienty-107322" target="_blank" >https://www.cs-gynekologie.cz/casopisy/ceska-gynekologie/2018-5-12/uskali-screeningu-gestacniho-diabetu-v-ceske-republice-pruzkum-mezi-pacienty-107322</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Pitfalls in screening for gestational diabetes in the Czech Republic - patient survey
Original language description
Objective: The aim of our survey was to investigate gestational diabetes (GDM) screening policy in the Czech Republic with regards to the correct methodology of the screening. Materials and methods:1100 anonymous questionnaires were distributed among patients of a tertiary level obstetric department from July 2015 to September 2015. Results: 958 (87.0%) questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. 794 (82.9%) of participants had at least one risk factor for GDM development. The oGTT was performed in 751 (94.6%) women at risk of GDM and 153 (93.3%) women at low risk of GDM. From the 904 performed oGTT, 154 (17.0%) were performed completely by recommended standards. In the remaining cases, at least one deviation from standard was noted. The results of oGTT were provided by 364 (40.3%) of respondents. In this subgroup, 71 (19.5%) matched International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group's (IADPSG) criteria for GDM diagnosis. However, these women were often not those who were evaluated as screening positive by the office gynaecologist. Conclusion: The screening for GDM was frequently not performed in accordance with the national guidelines and the diagnostic criteria used were not uniform.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NV15-27630A" target="_blank" >NV15-27630A: Endocrine function of adipose tissue in the etiopathogenesis of the gestational diabetes.</a><br>
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Česká gynekologie
ISSN
1210-7832
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
83
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
348-353
UT code for WoS article
000470768600004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85062585538