Inadvertent QRS prolongation by an optimization device-based algorithm in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F22%3A00083687" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/22:00083687 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/22:10448812 RIV/00216208:11150/22:10448812 RIV/00179906:_____/22:10448812
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275276" target="_blank" >https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0275276</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275276" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pone.0275276</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Inadvertent QRS prolongation by an optimization device-based algorithm in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
Original language description
Background Device-based algorithms offer the potential for automated optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the process for accepting them into clinical use is currently still ad-hoc, rather than based on pre-clinical and clinical testing of specific features of validity. We investigated how the QuickOpt-guided VV delay (VVD) programming performs against the clinical and engineering heuristic of QRS complex shortening by CRT. Methods A prospective, 2-center study enrolled 37 consecutive patients with CRT. QRS complex duration (QRSd) was assessed during intrinsic atrioventricular conduction, synchronous biventricular pacing, and biventricular pacing with QuickOpt-proposed VVD. The measurements were done manually by electronic calipers in signal-averaged and magnified 12-lead QRS complexes. Results Native QRSd was 174 +/- 22 ms. Biventricular pacing with empiric AVD and synchronous VVD resulted in QRSd 156 +/- 20 ms, a significant narrowing from the baseline QRSd by 17 +/- 27 ms, P = 0.0003. In 36 of 37 patients, the QuickOpt algorithm recommended left ventricular preexcitation with VVD of 42 +/- 18 ms (median 40 ms; interquartile range 30-55 ms, P < 0.00001). QRSd in biventricular pacing with QuickOpt-based VVD was significantly longer compared with synchronous biventricular pacing (168 +/- 25 ms vs. 156 +/- 20 ms; difference 12 +/- 11ms; P < 0.00001). This prolongation correlated with the absolute VVD value (R = 0.66, P < 0.00001). Conclusions QuickOpt algorithm systematically favours a left-preexcitation VVD which translates into a significant prolongation of the QRSd compared to synchronous biventricular pacing. There is no reason to believe that a manipulation that systematically widens QRSd should be considered to optimize physiology. Device-based CRT optimization algorithms should undergo systematic mechanistic pre-clinical evaluation in various scenarios before they are tested in large clinical studies.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
PLoS ONE [online]
ISSN
1932-6203
e-ISSN
1932-6203
Volume of the periodical
17
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
"art. no. e0275276"
UT code for WoS article
000922920400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85138626724