All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F23%3A00084415" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/23:00084415 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00064173:_____/23:43926003

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/72/12/2286.full.pdf" target="_blank" >https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/72/12/2286.full.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329700" target="_blank" >10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329700</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a randomised trial

  • Original language description

    BackgroundEndoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been promoted as palliative treatment for patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in order to improve biliary drainage and eventually prolong survival. No high level evidence is, however, available on this technique.DesignIn this randomised controlled study, we compared endoluminal RFA plus stenting with stenting alone (control group) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction; metal stents were primarily placed. Primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were stent patency, quality of life and adverse events. In a superiority design, survival was assumed to be doubled by RFA as compared with 6.4 months in the control group (n=280).ResultsA total of 161 patients (male:female 90:71, mean age 71 &amp; PLUSMN;9 years) were randomised before recruitment was terminated for futility after an interim analysis. Eighty-five patients had CCA (73 hilar, 12 distal) and 76 had pancreatic cancer. There was no difference in survival in both subgroups: for patients with CCA, median survival was 10.5 months (95% CI 6.7 to 18.3) in the RFA group vs 10.6 months (95% CI 9.0 to 24.8), p=0.58)) in the control group. In the subgroup with pancreatic cancer, median survival was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.3 to 9.7) for the RFA vs 7.7 months (95% CI 5.6 to 11.3), p=0.73) for the control group. No benefit was seen in the RFA group with regard to stent patency (at 12 months 40% vs 36% in CCA and 66% vs 65% in PDAC), and quality of life was unchanged by either treatment and comparable between the groups. Adverse events occurred in seven patients in each groups.ConclusionA combination of endoluminal RFA and stenting was not superior to stenting alone in prolonging survival or improving stent patency in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.Trial registration numberNCT03166436.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/NV17-30281A" target="_blank" >NV17-30281A: Radiofrequency ablation in therapy of biliary and pancreatic disease</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Gut

  • ISSN

    0017-5749

  • e-ISSN

    1468-3288

  • Volume of the periodical

    72

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    12

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    2286-2293

  • UT code for WoS article

    001058398600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85170670853