The reliability of clock drawing test scoring systems modeled on the normative data in healthy aging and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F17%3A43914848" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/17:43914848 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00159816:_____/17:00064232 RIV/00216208:11110/17:10361191 RIV/00064165:_____/17:10361191
Result on the web
<a href="http://asm.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/02/27/1073191116632586" target="_blank" >http://asm.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/02/27/1073191116632586</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191116632586" target="_blank" >10.1177/1073191116632586</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The reliability of clock drawing test scoring systems modeled on the normative data in healthy aging and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Original language description
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a commonly used tool in clinical practice and research for cognitive screening among older adults. The main goal of the present study was to analyze the inter-rater reliability of three different CDT scoring systems [by Shulman et al. (1993, 1986), by Babins et al. (2008) and by Cohen et al. (2000)]. We used a clock with a pre-drawn circle. The CDT was evaluated by three independent raters based on the normative data set of healthy older and very old adults and patients with non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI) (N = 438; aged 61 to 94). We confirmed a high inter-rater reliability measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): Shulman ICC = .809, Babins ICC = .894, and Cohen ICC = .862, all p < .001. We found that age and education levels have a significant effect on CDT performance, yet there was no influence of gender. Finally, the scoring systems differentiated between age- and education-matched controls and naMCI: Shulman AUC = .84, Cohen AUC = .71, all p < .001; and a slightly lower discriminative ability was showing by Babins: AUC = .65, p = .012; (p ≤ .01).
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Assessment
ISSN
1073-1911
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
24
Issue of the periodical within the volume
7
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
945-957
UT code for WoS article
000411124400009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85029351794