All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Methods and tools to assess implementation of mental health policies and plans: A systematic review

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F23%3A43921154" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/23:43921154 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-mental-health/article/methods-and-tools-to-assess-implementation-of-mental-health-policies-and-plans-a-systematic-review/0361A5F59F5C0BDF7F64D6FA1B7B5D93" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-mental-health/article/methods-and-tools-to-assess-implementation-of-mental-health-policies-and-plans-a-systematic-review/0361A5F59F5C0BDF7F64D6FA1B7B5D93</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.3" target="_blank" >10.1017/gmh.2023.3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Methods and tools to assess implementation of mental health policies and plans: A systematic review

  • Original language description

    Mental health policies and plans (MHPPs) are important policy instruments and powerful tools to facilitate development of mental health systems and services across the world. We aimed to map and analyse methods and tools used to assess the extent, process and impact of implementing MHPPs. We systematically searched peer-reviewed and grey literature across seven scientific databases. We extracted and analysed the data on a) the characteristics of included studies (e.g., policy areas, region of origin, income setting) and b) the methodology and evaluation tools applied to assess the extent and process of implementation. We included 48 studies in the analyses. Twenty-six of these studies employed only qualitative methods (e.g., semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, desk review, stakeholder consultations); 12 studies used quantitative methods (e.g., trend analysis, survey) and 10 used mixed-methods approaches. Generally, methods and tools used for assessment were described poorly with less than half of the studies providing partial or full details about them. Only three studies provided assessment of full policies. There is a lack of rigorous research to assess implementation MHPPs. Assessments of the implementation of entire MHPPs are almost non-existent. Strategies to assess the implementation of MHPPs should be an integral part of MHPPs.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30215 - Psychiatry

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Global Mental Health

  • ISSN

    2054-4251

  • e-ISSN

    2054-4251

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    e12

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    1-22

  • UT code for WoS article

    000961697400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database