Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F20%3A00525199" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/20:00525199 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/" target="_blank" >https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111" target="_blank" >10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies
Original language description
This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy-and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
One Ecosystem
ISSN
2367-8194
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
5
Issue of the periodical within the volume
JUN
Country of publishing house
BG - BULGARIA
Number of pages
31
Pages from-to
e53111
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85086379289