All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F20%3A00525199" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/20:00525199 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/" target="_blank" >https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/53111/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111" target="_blank" >10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies

  • Original language description

    This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy-and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    One Ecosystem

  • ISSN

    2367-8194

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    5

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    JUN

  • Country of publishing house

    BG - BULGARIA

  • Number of pages

    31

  • Pages from-to

    e53111

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85086379289