All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of standardized methods of susceptibility determination of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Streptococcus suis field isolates to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027162%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000078" target="_blank" >RIV/00027162:_____/19:N0000078 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of standardized methods of susceptibility determination of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Streptococcus suis field isolates to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin

  • Original language description

    The aim of study was comparison of results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Streptococcus suis field isolates to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin obtained using the standardized methodologies accepted by Clinical Laboratory Testing Institute and European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – disc diffusion test, agar dilution method and broth microdilution method and E-test. The results of susceptibility testing obtained by the above mentioned methods were compared each other in terms of usability, accuracy, speed of performing and possibilities of interpretation of results. If we compare the AST results obtained by the individual tested methods, we have to exclude the results of the disc diffusion test from the evaluation. The sizes of the zones of inhibition and the MIC values cannot be compared and no correlation between determined inhibition zones and the MIC values for the individual isolates was found. Presented MIC values determined for isolates in E-test are slightly different from MIC values determined by diffusion tests due to the various specific concentrations that allow these tests to be evaluated. In general, the MIC values determined by these three tests were similar with slight differences that were essentially at a concentration range similar to ranges of the MIC, which are usually referred as acceptable for reference strains according to AST methodologies (mostly range of three concentrations in two-fold dilution series).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    V<sub>souhrn</sub> - Summary research report

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40301 - Veterinary science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Place of publication

    Brno

  • Publisher/client name

    Ceva Santé Animale S.A, a corporation whose head office is located at 10, avenue de la Ballastière, 33501 Libourne, France

  • Version