All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Efficiency of sperm separation by using microfluidic chips compared to the swim up method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027162%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000042" target="_blank" >RIV/00027162:_____/25:N0000042 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/65269705:_____/25:00082137 RIV/00216224:14110/25:00141415

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/acb-2025-0001?tab=abstract" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/acb-2025-0001?tab=abstract</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/acb-2025-0001" target="_blank" >10.2478/acb-2025-0001</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Efficiency of sperm separation by using microfluidic chips compared to the swim up method

  • Original language description

    The effectiveness of assisted reproduction methods is still not as high as was expected recently. For effective therapy, it is necessary to use only the highest quality sperm for oocyte fertilization, as the fertilization process most often takes place using the ICSI technique, i.e. direct injection of sperm into the oocyte. For these reasons, separation techniques are constantly being developed, and in a relatively short period of time the view of these procedures has changed. In recent years, microfluidic chip techniques have been increasingly applied. In this study, we compared the swim up technique with the two most used chips (ca0 and ZYMOT). We tested the efficiency of these separation methods against the swim-up method. In this study, we evaluated sperm concentration, motility, morphology, acrosome status and DNA integrity before and after separation methods. Each patient’s ejaculate was separated simultaneously by the swim up method and both chips. It turned out that the separation methods are very similar in motility, concentration and acrosome status and sperm morphology. However, in the case of DNA fragmentation, a significant difference in the reduction of the proportion of fragmented spermatozoa was found only with the chips and not with the swim-up method. Moreover, when comparing the relative effectiveness of sperm reduction with fragmented DNA, the ZYMOT method was more effective than Ca0. However, the differences between the chips were not statistically significant with an average of 18%.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30220 - Andrology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LUC23009" target="_blank" >LUC23009: Advanced methods of evaluation of male ejaculate and human sperm separation techniques</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Medical Journal of Cell Biology

  • ISSN

    2544-3577

  • e-ISSN

    2544-3577

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1-8

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    999