All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Swim-Up and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Methods in Selection of Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F25%3A00082116" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/25:00082116 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/11/5374" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/11/5374</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115374" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijms26115374</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Swim-Up and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Methods in Selection of Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

  • Original language description

    The use of microfluidic sperm sorting (MFSS) systems in infertility treatment is increasing due to their practicality and ease of use. While often presented as highly effective, their efficacy in patients with varying sperm analysis results remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of MFSS compared with the swim-up (SU) technique in terms of oxygen radical levels and spermiogram parameters. Samples from each patient were processed using both methods, followed by assessments of sperm concentration, motility, morphology, DNA integrity, acrosomal status, and mitochondrial membrane potential. Participants were selected based on sperm analysis and categorized as normozoospermic (n = 40) or non-normozoospermic (n = 28). An analysis of separation techniques revealed no significant differences, except for a lower percentage of DNA-fragmented sperm in the MFSS group compared with SU within the non-normozoospermic cohort (SU: 10.0% vs. MFSS: 5.69%, p = 0.027). No differences were observed between SU and MFSS in normozoospermic men. The MFSS method is a simple technique, frequently used in laboratories, that yields good results but does not offer a substantial advantage over SU. The primary benefit of MFSS appears to be a significant reduction in the proportion of sperm with DNA fragmentation compared with SU in patients with abnormal sperm analysis results.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LUC23009" target="_blank" >LUC23009: Advanced methods of evaluation of male ejaculate and human sperm separation techniques</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences

  • ISSN

    1422-0067

  • e-ISSN

    1422-0067

  • Volume of the periodical

    26

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    5374

  • UT code for WoS article

    001506564100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105007834840