Phosphorus Removal in Low-Flux Hemodialysis, High-Flux Hemodialysis, and Hemodiafiltration
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F16%3A10325264" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/16:10325264 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/16:10325264 RIV/00843989:_____/16:E0105998
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313" target="_blank" >10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Phosphorus Removal in Low-Flux Hemodialysis, High-Flux Hemodialysis, and Hemodiafiltration
Original language description
Phosphorus removal by hemoelimination procedure is a important mechanism to maintain phosphorus level in acceptable level in patients on dialysis. Phosphorus is removed by both diffusion and convection, but in clinical practice, it is not possible to differentiate the contribution of this two transport modalities. We used Gutzwiller formula to quantify the amount of removed phosphorus and compared it in low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF). There were no significant differences in phosphorus predialysis concentration, duration of procedure, processed blood volume and ultrafiltration, e.g., factors, which could possibly influence phosphorus elimination. All three tested dialysis modes also did not differ in urea dialysis dose (Kt/V) as a parameter of small molecular weight removal (LFHD, 1.50 +/- 0.04 vs HFHD, 1.5 +/- 0.06 vs HDF, 1.5 +/- 0.05). The amount of removed phosphorus in LFHD, HFHD, and HDF was 34.0 +/- 1.2, 37.8 +/- 1.6, and 38.3 +/- 1.4 mmol, respectively. Statistically significant increase in phosphorus removal was seen only with use of high-flux membrane (HFHD and HDF) when compared with the low-flux one. No difference was, however, found between HFHD and HDF. It can thus be concluded that phosphorus removal in all three dialysis modes is a predominantly diffusive issue and contribution of convection to it is minor to negligible.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FE - Other fields of internal medicine
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
ASAIO Journal
ISSN
1058-2916
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
62
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
176-181
UT code for WoS article
000371747300012
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84961198400