Can sit-to-walk assessment maximize instrumented timed up & go test output?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F19%3A10395997" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/19:10395997 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/19:10395997 RIV/68407700:21460/19:00331307
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5220/0007523902090213" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5220/0007523902090213</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0007523902090213" target="_blank" >10.5220/0007523902090213</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Can sit-to-walk assessment maximize instrumented timed up & go test output?
Original language description
Daily human activities commonly include standing from a seated position. In research this transition is investigated, among others, as a part of a functional Timed Up & Go test. Spatio-temporal parameters are widely used to assess the sit-to-walk transition. Usually, the parameters calculated for the sit-to-walk signal is in its entirety. Another approach primarily splits the transition into phases and then calculates parameters for individual phases separately. The objective of this work is to examine whether splitting the Timed Up & Go test into subphases provides additional value for transition assessment. In order to compare both approaches, we utilized angular rate parameters (duration, peak value, mean, variance) and analyzed their reliability. The reliability proved to be dependent on the subject group and transition phase. In addition, we compared transition parameters from the entire transition and individual phases between the two subject groups. The mean only differentiated between the subject groups in individual phases, but not is entire transition. To summarize, splitting the transition into phases turned out to be beneficial for sit-to-walk transition assessment.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 5: BIOSIGNALS
ISBN
978-989-758-353-7
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
209-213
Publisher name
SciTePress
Place of publication
neuveden
Event location
Prague
Event date
Feb 22, 2019
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—