Appropriateness of CT pulmonary angiograms according to current diagnostic guidelines based on risk stratification
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F21%3AN0000014" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/21:N0000014 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.049" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.049</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2020.049" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2020.049</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Appropriateness of CT pulmonary angiograms according to current diagnostic guidelines based on risk stratification
Original language description
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Assessment of appropriateness of CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) is based on risk stratification algorithms such as simplified the Geneva Score (sGS) in combination with D-dimer blood tests. The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic yield and appropriateness of CTPA examinations in accordance with 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 155 outpatients who underwent CTPA for clinical suspicion of PE were gathered from the radiology information system (RIS) and the clinical information system (CIS). We assessed the presence of sGS items and D-dimer blood test results in RIS from CTPA request forms and from clinical documentation in CIS. RESULTS: Based on the RIS, there were 2.6% patients with high (sGS>=3) and 97.4% patients with low pre-test PE probability (sGS<3), and CTPA indication was formally comprehendible in 75.5% using sGS and D-dimer blood tests. Based on RIS and CIS data in combination, there were 41.3% patients with high and 58.7% patients with low pre-test PE probability, and CTPA indication was formally comprehendible in 88.4%. Using RIS and CIS in combination, PE probability was upgraded from low to high probability in 39.7% compared with RIS alone. In 12.9%, there was a lack of data in RIS for CTPA justification. CONCLUSION: There is a high diagnostic yield when applying current diagnostic guidelines to our data. There was however a notable discrepancy between the data transferred to the CTPA request forms from the full clinical documentation, therefore not readily available for clinical decision making.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Biomedical Papers
ISSN
1213-8118
e-ISSN
1804-7521
Volume of the periodical
165
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
51-56
UT code for WoS article
000629606300008
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85103116575