All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F22%3A43921579" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/22:43921579 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11120/22:43921579 RIV/00216208:11130/22:10427832

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381211013975" target="_blank" >10.1177/17085381211013975</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

  • Original language description

    BACKGROUND: One of the three commercially available cyanoacrylate venous glues used for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency is the VariClose(R) vein sealing system. Previous studies have documented a high rate of occlusion and minimal postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare occlusion rates and clinical outcomes of endovenous laser treatment with the VariClose(R) vein sealing system in the treatment of truncal vein insufficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized single center study with prospectively collected data comparing endovenous laser treatment and VariClose(R) procedures between April 2018 and November 2019. RESULTS: VariClose(R) was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and endovenous laser treatment in 42 patients (51 veins). The occlusion rate at one, three, and six months were 96%, 85%, and 65% for VariClose(R) procedures and 100%, 100%, and 97% for endovenous laser treatment procedures (p = 0.01), respectively. Reduction of VCSS scores before treatment and at the last postoperative follow-up visit in the VariClose(R) group dropped by an average of 1.8 +- 1.6 and in the endovenous laser treatment by an average of 3.3 +- 2.9 (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: VariClose(R) vein sealing system is inferior to endovenous laser treatment as a treatment option for varicose veins as it has a higher recanalization rate.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30212 - Surgery

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Vascular

  • ISSN

    1708-5381

  • e-ISSN

    1708-539X

  • Volume of the periodical

    30

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    542-547

  • UT code for WoS article

    000653325100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85106311641