All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F23%3A43926244" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/23:43926244 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11130/23:10472591 RIV/00216208:11120/23:43926244

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33678/cor.2023.054" target="_blank" >10.33678/cor.2023.054</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of cyanoacrylate agents VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM in the treatment of insufficient saphenous veins

  • Original language description

    Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the cyanoacrylate venous sealing systems VenaSealTM and VariClose(R) in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Methods: A single-centre retrospective analysis on patients treated between April 2018 and April 2022 with cyanoacrylate adhesives for lower limb superficial truncal vein insufficiency was performed. Results: The VariClose(R) system was used in 27 patients (30 veins) and the VenaSealTM system in 97 patients (125 veins). The median follow-up periods for patients treated with VariClose(R) and VenaSealTM systems were 267 (IQR 223) and 201 (IQR 280) days, respectively. At one year, recanalization occurred in 11 veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 5 veins treated with the VenaSealTM system. The occlusion rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method at 30, 90, 180, and 360 days were 100%, 96%, 83%, and 42% for veins treated with the VariClose(R) system and 100%, 98%, 96%, and 91% for veins treated with the VenaSealTM system (p &lt;0.01). Conclusions: The VenaSealTM system had significantly better occlusion rates than the VariClose(R) system.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Cor et Vasa

  • ISSN

    0010-8650

  • e-ISSN

    1803-7712

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    729-734

  • UT code for WoS article

    001153313700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85179405148